AI Social Credit Score and Disability Discrimination

It affects us all.

The rise of AI and the use of disability rights to combat it.

For most of us that are at least 40 years old, we remember going to a job interview or a church gathering, or buying a car, without having our entire lives accessible to others at the push of a few buttons.

Let’s be real. We all wear masks. I’m entirely angry about certain subjects, and I’m free enough to spout off on the internet about these subjects, and realize that judgment is subjective.

But it is that subjectivity, and the inferred objectivity and psychological splitting that is applied when a job interviewer, church committee, or a car salesman, will use to ban us from certain activities and benefits of the social framework. And it doesn’t stop there. AI and the social credit score that is coming will affect every aspect of our lives. Larry Ellison has let the cat out of the bag. He want’s everyone on their best behavior, according to the parameters that some obscure, non-reachable committee decides is good behavior.

The American right of dissent, it will be gone in this AI - social score framework. It will be gone, because to dissent will be relegated as a demerit on the social score framework.

But isn’t dissent a right? Of course it is. Look at almost any Supreme Court ruling, and you’ll find a dissent. Even SCOTUS exercises this right, even against the popular vote and majority opinion.

The Religion of Government.

I have said before on now-deleted tiktok video, that the most dangerous religion in the world is government. It is the one religion that people are the most agreeable to kill for.

You may argue that government is not a religion, but here are the tenets I measure it against.

1. A central unreachable (not subject to cross-examination) authority at the top. Just like mainstream religions that have “representatives” (pastors, bishops, priests, imams, etc.) They all have differing opinions on what the true authority, their scriptures or holy writings say. The figure at the top, “God” at least the god of many religions, at one time allegedly appeared to men and gave inspired direction. No more. That same God, at least in the way I was raised - Christian, is alleged to be all powerful (omnipotent), all present (omnipresent) and all-knowing (omniscient). And if that God, can, at any time in history, make himself visibly and audibly known to men, to give them guidance, then why not now
   
   But God does not appear. And the “government”, likewise, does not appear, neither at any court hearing, nor at any other function of government. Only a representative is present, and this is a high magic that should be resisted at every turn. If you can’t speak to the one who made the rule you are alleged to have breached, you should not have a conviction of a crime. If you cannot question the origin and the consent factors of why you are subject, in an allegedly “free” society, then you cannot be logically held to account for violation(s) of such imposed subjection.

2. Sacred truths that cannot be questioned. I’ve often said that “sacred” is just an anagram for “scared”. Question a government official, and see how quickly the ego and the narcissism appear. “How dare you question my authority?!” is the theme of this operation, and one is just expected to go along with it.
   
   A problematic trend is developing, however, in that people are starting to ask for the reasonable articulable suspicion before providing ID. They are starting to ask for the authority upon which the claims of “you must submit” (to my whims) originated.
   
   This dissent, this questioning of authority cannot be sustainable in a governmental situation. Govern-Mental… Did you catch that?
   
   “Respect my authoriaaaah.” Religion is always governed with the fear of jail or hell, and government exists by providing services at the business end of a gun.

3. Dogma that seems absolute, but is malleable. The Constitution (for the United States of America), has absolutely no provision for the following:

• a police force

• absolute immunity

• judicial immunity

• prosecutorial immunity

• allowing cops to lie, while expecting us to tell the truth…

and much more…

The fact is, there are no absolutes except one thing. You have no rights, absolutely no right at all, except the right of choice - free will. And when AI says you can’t exercise free will, what will you do?

I submit that the implementation of AI in concert with a social credit score is a distinct and factual disability upon the basic human (some say “God given”) right of free will and choice.

When AI social credit implementation comes into being, one will be immediately judged, by an unreachable, unquestionable, omnipotent arbiter, enforced by a local representative (religion) and one will immediately be punished for any perceived or even alleged misalignment with the social demand of absolute behavior without dissent of any kind. That vaccination you don’t trust? So what? You want to eat, don’t you?

This is a physical and mental impairment that substantially limits most of the major life activities. Working, caring for oneself, communicating, interacting with others, and the list goes on. Banks will shut down your account based on your social credit score. Jobs will be unavailable based on your social credit score. Home purchase and rental will be out of reach based upon your social credit score.

Just comply, and you’ll be fine.

Or, will you invoke the disability rights that you have, and allege (factually) that the implementation of the AI social credit score has (a) regarded you as disabled for “behavioral” disability, and (b) has actually created a disability that is a physical and mental impairment that substantially limits one or major life activities, and (c) has used both of these classifications to discriminate against you and deny you equal access to every-day activities based solely on these disability classifications.

Just my thoughts… This is coming.

P.D., Jay V. Shore, Certified ADA Advocate