Today, I was called a sovereign citizen because I help people fight for their ADA rights in court. US Bankruptcy Trustees attacked my client in intimidation and coercive operation, to attack me as well, and a client’s attorney went full fucking emotional with his claims that I needed to get authority from him to assert the ADA rights of the individual he was representing (who I was engaged separately to aid).
All in all, a full day of warfare/lawfare. I expect one or more bar investigations from today, because I dared to stand up to these fuckers that call themselves “your honor” while simultaneously being afraid as fuck to face accountability, hiding behind their presumed cloak of “judicial immunity.”
Another case, a judge brought up the Order from Nevada’s most reversed federal judge Robert Clive Jones (order and his letter to the State Bar of Nevada attached below"), in which he claims that I am without a doubt, practicing law without a license.
The judge that brought this bogus order up, Jeffrey Moreland, of Elizabeth City, NC, did it to impugn my character and insert inflammatory rhetoric in his denial of my ability to aid and encourage my client under the ADA (a capacity that is federally protected in 42 U.S.C. §12203(b))
If you want to see this video in an excerpted version, it is here:
So, I had to sit with my ego today, and determine if what these people said about me and my activities was (1) factual, (b) relevant, (c) even worth considering, (d) to have an impact on me in any way, and (d) how I should respond to this day.
In vulnerability, I felt angry, offended, and even thought “why am I doing this?”
Then I remembered the fool. I saw a movie once that observed that the Fool card in the Tarot deck (much like the Joker card) is a wild card, a card of possibilities, where all potential endings exist.
I’ve lived my life like the fool, my bag over my shoulder, a little dog nipping at my heels, on the edge of the cliff, taking the next step in abandon of reason and caution.
I’ve often had people tell me that no one stands up to the system like I do. There’s a reason, actually many reasons why that may be a thing I do. They made me. They created this monster inside me (Thank you Jordan Peterson).
Judge Lindsay R. Davis, Jr. in NC was one of the first to create this monster. I was in a lawsuit against the Clerk of Superior Court in NC, for foreclosing on my home in fraud and without a proper oath of office (which NCGS 14-229 says is a crime and they are to be ejected from office).
Judge Davis asked the opposing counsel (NC Assistant Attorney General Grady Balentine, Jr.) a question about the oath. Grady didn’t know the answer, and indicated this on the record. So, Judge Davis looked up the answer, and gave it to Grady, which aided my adversary, and prejudiced my case irreparably. It was outright collusion.
So, I filed my first “Bill quia timet” which is an old English writ to address fears of harms and future harms. I called Davis everything but a son-of-a-bitch. I said it was my fear, apprehension, and belief that he was without honor, integrity, or impartiality.
I spelled out, from the official transcript, page and line, where he asked my adversary a question, my adversary didn’t know the answer, and where Davis then aided my adversary, to my detriment on the record.
I said “I hereby accuse this court of collusion.”
There was more, but I signed this legal document and went to the Clerk’s office and filed it into the record.
The next hearing, in candor, I was afraid, and had told my wife at the time, that I was apt to be arrested for contempt and jailed. I warned her.
I took a friend in that was as big as I was, and even so, I was scared as a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs. They had 6 deputies in there, and I knew they were there to intimidate me.
I’ll never forget what Judge Davis did next. He got up on the bench, called my case, and said “Mr. Shore has accused this court of collusion, and a reasonable person would not expect an impartial adjudicator after that fact, and I hereby recuse myself from this case.” BAM! He slammed the gavel down and got up and walked out of the courtroom.
Lindsay Davis Jr. had just shown me what judges do when they are challenged in a way they can’t defend. THEY RUN.
Judicial immunity is a license to abuse, and even maliciously harm those to whom expect “justice” to be fair, impartial, and with integrity.
Today, Judge Jeffrey Moreland ran also.
There’s a saying in lawyer lore, of an example from law school training. It goes like this: If you have the law on your side, focus on the law. If you have the facts on your side, focus on the facts. If you have neither, attack the other side’s character.
The lowest common denominator for courtrooms all across America is god-complex individuals that call themselves “your honor,” while being completely dishonorable.
I get to interface with these social deviants on a regular basis.
I asked ChatGPT for the definition of social deviancy. Here’s ChatGPT’s return:
“Social deviancy refers to behavior, beliefs, or actions that violate the norms, values, or expectations of a particular society or social group. It encompasses any conduct that goes against societal standards, whether formal (laws, regulations) or informal (customs, etiquette).
Social deviance can be categorized into two types:
Formal Deviance: Actions that violate laws or official rules, such as theft, vandalism, or other criminal behaviors.
Informal Deviance: Behavior that breaches social norms or expectations but doesn't necessarily break laws, such as dressing in unconventional ways or rejecting traditional cultural practices.
Social deviance is a subject of study in sociology, criminology, and psychology, as it provides insights into social control mechanisms, cultural values, and the boundaries of acceptable behavior. It can vary depending on cultural, historical, and situational contexts.”
Let’s look at this particular part: “Social deviancy refers to behavior, beliefs, or actions that violate the norms, values, or expectations of a particular society or social group”
That’s judicial immunity, and the harms that occur behind this masked ego-inflated disorder called “your honor.”
Today created a stronger version of me. More tenacity, more doggedness, and more purpose.
Call me the fool. Call me whatever you want. But I’m here, and as long as I’m here,my contempt for judicial immunity increases exponentially with every encounter of these all-powerful acting punks that are afraid to be honest, accountable, and dispense true justice.
Fuck ‘em.
P.D., JAY V. SHORE, as Certified ADA Advocate, and obstinate motherfucker.
EXCERPTED LETTER FROM THE STATE BAR OF NEVADA AND JONES, FOLLOWED BY THE STATE BAR CLOSURE LETTER.
STATE BAR OF NEVADA CLOSURE LETTER:
"I was called a sovereign citizen" The thought had occurred to me while watching that video. Regardless of where you stand on the issue, it is amazing to watch intelligent people assert sovereign status to the point where the judge throws a tantrum and runs out of the courtroom in frustration (after issuing a variety of threats). Even some bailiffs seem to understand the limits of their authority better the judge in those situations.
The ideas we get about judges from the television are pure fantasy, these are some of the most unaccountable, incompetent, and corrupt elements of our system. Our courts would be far better run by computers, even prior to AI. Like, a spreadsheet/flowchart would be better.
And the idea that they collude with each other and get orders from higher up is undeniable. When businesses started getting shut down and forcing people to mask, I was certain that a lawsuit or two would put a quick stop to this unconstitutional nonsense, but there doesn't seem to be a lawyer in the country who actually took any of it on.
If you're a net asset to your clients, keep going.
God Bless you Jay Shore. The absolute immunity rule for corrupt judges should be invalidated. 28 USC 455 requires federal judges who have conflicts of interest or who may not be disinterested must recuse themselves automatically. Without any motion for recusal being filed. The Question remains is Absolute Immunity available to a judge who violates 28 USC 455? Will 42 USC 1983 support a claim against such an offending judge?