So, today, I happened across a TikTok video where a disabled individual with a legit service dog posted their dog in a vest and said…
Here was the vest:
This confused me, and I am truly not homophobic, but the though of assigning an animal a sexual preference seems… disturbing. So, I asked “How did you obtain consent to classify the dog’s sexual preference?”
Let’s be serious, the world has gone mad. If we dare mis-classify someone’s sexual preference without consent they would be on a rampage before the utterance is finished. Consent is allegedly big with this mindset, so I asked about consent. What comes next is just a demonstration of how this mindset doesn’t consider all of the implications of their actions.
I made sure to assert that I am not homophobic:
I gotta be honest, the “very explicit consent” brought up involuntary pictures of peanut butter and well…
They came back with:
This left more questions, so I had to ask:
And finally, they said:
This just goes to show, that IF you do not attack them, and ask questions about how they gained consent, it is possible to provide a mirror that shows them the disturbing implications of their own actions. I’m surprised the dog isn’t named Jif…
This is no different than dressing an infant in a “Gayby” outfit. It is (a) an adult dressing up a minor who cannot consent, with markers for their own self-affirming benefit, because they need constant affirmation, which is definitely exploitative as it relates to the minor, and/or (b) a marker for a fetish, meaning they cannot outright say that they are attracted to children, or have pedophilic desires, so instead, they dress one a minor with a outfit listing sexual preference, when minors cannot consent, and this is just a part of ushering in pedophilia. It is already in the works. Bet your life that bestiality will be next.
Goddamn “Gay Dog.”
DAFuck outta here with that shit.
P.D., JAY V. SHORE