If a lawyer is considered an officer of the court, and the court is a (public) government entity, would that not make all Lawyers (both public or private practicing) a (public) government entity? If so, would that not make them fall under the Title II (State and Local Governments) Regulations?
That's plausible, but a stretch. GALs, Public Defenders, etc, who are directly appointed by the court are attached to Title II as well. But for that to fit a privately hired attorney, I would steer away from that argument. There's enough there with the Title III implications.
You go, Jay! Calling them on their atrocious bullshit con job!
If a lawyer is considered an officer of the court, and the court is a (public) government entity, would that not make all Lawyers (both public or private practicing) a (public) government entity? If so, would that not make them fall under the Title II (State and Local Governments) Regulations?
That's plausible, but a stretch. GALs, Public Defenders, etc, who are directly appointed by the court are attached to Title II as well. But for that to fit a privately hired attorney, I would steer away from that argument. There's enough there with the Title III implications.