The ADA 2-Step
Or, how the ADA applies to you.
ABSENT INTENT OR AUTHORITY AS LEGAL ADVICE.
(This post is an attempt to show you how to stop being bullied, by asserting the ADA as a remedy.)
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and it’s improvement, the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (collectively “ADA), is a social engineering tool from it’s conception. It proposes to make discrimination on the basis of disability illegal.
In today’s incessant barrage of totalitarian aggression, the American populace is rightfully shell-shocked. Accusation Trauma is the new normal. Everywhere we turn, there is a fear tripwire, waiting with an explosion of consequences, should we happen to be labeled as “anti-vax” or “anti-mask:” or “anti-science” or “anti-trans” or “anti-(fill in the blank)”.
What is actually going on is a clever liability distribution of a two-step process that places the consumer, employee, or citizen into a corner, without knowing how they got there, or how to escape. After having worked in this field for 5 years, it has become clear to me that since the presentation of the COVID narrative, and everything that has followed it, there are two distinct steps that are often in play on paralyzing the public into non-response.
What Are The Steps?
Step 1: A disability is created.
The ADA defines a disability as a “physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.” The ADA also intends broad, expansive, and maximum access to the use of the law, so someone saying “that’s a stretch” may have merit, but stretching the meaning of disability is actually in line with the stated intent of the ADA. See 28 CFR §35.101(b), 28 CFR §36.101(b), and 29 CFR §1630(c)(4). I hear people say “But, I’m not disabled” all the time, and they simply overlook the broad definition of disability, and how societal constructs can be a disability.
What is the disability?
Since the start of COVID, I’ve seen two different disabilities that are in play. The first is when an employer, local government, or public accommodations implement policies that consider the employees, citizens, or consumers to be “regarded as” disabled. “Regarded as” is the third prong of the definition of disabled. It refers to when you are treated as if you have a disability, whether you have one or not.
Many times, these entities rely on other entities, (WHO, FDA, CDC, and State Health Authorities) to blame their actions on.
The policies that require vaccination (for any disease, not just COVID) are regarding their intended subjects as disabled. (Similarly, masking and testing policies are also “regarding as” disabled.) These policies regard the functions of the immune system to be disabled - unable to defeat and/or fight a pathogen.
Then, the policies offer an “accommodation” or a mitigator for the regarded as disability. They offer an injection (medicine) or masking (medical equipment) or testing (medical procedure) as an accommodation/mitigator for the “disability”.
NONE of this, in and of itself, is illegal. All of this is unethical. All of this is immoral, because it intersects with religious rights and human rights of autonomy and informed consent.
Step 2: The created disability is used to discriminate against you, if you question it, or do not conform fully.
It is at the moment that the ADA-subject entity uses this regarded as disability to exclude, discriminate, or incorporate the unlawful and prohibited acts (coercion, intimidation, threats, and interference with ADA rights) that the “regarded as” disability becomes an ACTUAL disability, because it substantially limits your ability to perform the major life activities of working, thinking, concentrating, speaking, communicating, interacting with others, caring for yourself, and more. This is when it actually becomes illegal, as well. Discrimination on the basis of disability is illegal. It has been since 1973. (Rehabilitation Act)
(See 28 CFR §35.134(b) for Title II’s listing of the prohibited and unlawful acts)
So, now, in addition to being regarded as disabled, with a disabled immune system, the policy and the enforcement of the policy - by using discrimination (unequal benefits), coercion, intimidation, threats, and interference - has created an ACTUAL (prong 1) disability because it is a physical and mental impairment that substantially limits most every life activity you had no issues with before the policy was introduced.
Step 1. Regard them as disabled. (This is a belief, and ot necessarily discriminatory.)
Step 2. Discriminate, retaliate, and punish them, using the prohibited acts if they don’t buy into it. (This is conduct that is discriminatory.)
That is the ADA 2-step. Start claiming your rights. I can help.
NOTE: This is a brief article, intended to show how the ADA definition of disability applies to you in the current mental war that is occurring. This is only the tip of the iceberg. For instance, masking creates it’s own set of “substantial limitations” on major life activites, which is an additional disability. Social distancing is also a created disability that substantially limits the major life activities of interacting with others, caring for oneself, etc..
I hope this connects the dots for you. If you benefitted from this explanation, you would benefit even more from subscribing to have regular access to this wholesale source for mental enemas.
P.D., JAY V SHORE, as Certified ADA Advocate. adarights (at) protonmail (dot) com
I am still banned from my companies offices and events because of my vax status. It is a terrible feeling.
"NONE of this, in and of itself, is illegal. All of this is unethical. All of this is immoral, because it intersects with religious rights and human rights of autonomy and informed consent."
If it's a RIGHT, how is it not illegal? (I know you're not a lawyer and may not be able to answer.)